L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) PLAINTIFF in O. S. No. 1137 of 2000, in the Court of the IV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, filed this revision, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, feeling aggrieved by an order passed by the trial Court, in an application filed under Section 11 (2) of Andhra Pradesh Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956 (for short "the Act" ).

( 2 ) THE petitioner is a builder. It entered into an agreement with the respondents on 7-9-1997, for the purpose of developing the suit schedule property, by constructing multi-storied complex. Various terms and conditions were agreed upon. It is stated that a sum of Rs. 4,00,000/- was paid to the respondents towards refundable deposit. In addition to that, petitioner claimed that it paid a sum of Rs. 80,000/- towards rent under the agreement. The possession of the property was to be delivered to the petitioner within a particular time, so as to enable ittocommence construction. Alleging that the respondents violated the conditions and did not deliver the possession of the land, the petitioner filed the suitforspecific performance of the agreement, dated 7-9-1997. The suit is pending trial. The pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document