SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 557

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Yelugula Subba Rao – Appellant
Versus
Perumalla sri Ramakrishna Murthy – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS second appeal is filed against the judgment in A. S. No. 37 of 1997 of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, tadepalligudem, through which it reversed the judgment and decree, dated 14-5-1997, of the Court of Principal District Munsif, tadepalligudem, in O. S. No. 129 of 1990.

( 2 ) THE 1st respondent filed the suit, initially, for the relief of perpetual injunction, restraining the appellant herein from interfering with his right of access by way of easement, for the purpose of ingress and egress from the plaint schedule property to the R and B road, through the road margin. Subsequently, the prayer for mandatory injunction for removal of pillars and restoration of the site to its normal position in R, R2, R6 and R7 portion of the road margin, was added. The 1st respondent contended that he purchased the suit schedule property under two separate sale deeds, dated 15-7-1974 and 24-5-1975, marked as Exs. A. 1 and A. 2, respectively. He pleaded that the western side of the suit schedule property is the Randb road and the appellant had encroached into the road margin before the suit schedule property and obstructed his access to the road.

( 3 ) THE appellant filed a written stat











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top