L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Vegendla Subba Rao – Appellant
Versus
Puwada Srinivasa rao – Respondent
( 2 ) THE relevant facts are as under: the 3rd respondent was the owner of the suit schedule house in an area of 1440 Sq. feet. He sold it through a sale deed dated 29-8-1963 (Ex. A-8), to the 2nd respondent. The appellant purchased the said property under two separate sale deeds, dated 24-9-1964 (Ex. P-1) and 10-12-1991 (Ex. B-2) from the 2nd respondent. He claims to have added some more constructions on the site in the year 1972. The 3rd respondent filed O. S. No. 247 of 1972 in the Court of district Munsif, Ongole, for recovery of balance of consideration under Ex. A. 8, from the 2nd respondent. Since the property was purchased by the appellant herein, in the meanwhile, he too was impleaded as defendant No. 2 in that suit. The suit was decreed ex parte on 17-7-1972. The suit schedule property was attached and thereafter, brought to sale, on 14-6-1983. The 1st respondent emerged as th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.