SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 670

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Nandam Mohanamma – Appellant
Versus
Markonda Narasimha Rao – Respondent


( 1 ) DEFENDANTS in O. S. No. 205 of 1989, on the file of the Court of principal District Munsif, Rajahmundry, are the appellants. 1

( 2 ) THE respondents filed the suit for the relief of recovery of possession of suit schedule property, on the basis of termination of the lease, and for damages for use and occupation of the suit schedule property, upto the date of the suit. It was pleaded that the open land of 149 sq. yards, situated in Ward No. 10, and described in the suit schedule, was leased to Sri Hemasundara Rao, the husband of the first appellant and father of appellants 2 and 3, initially, in the year 1968, for a period of ten years, and thereafter, in the year 1978 for another spell often years. It was alleged that the appellants did not vacate the premises, even after the expiry of the lease, and as such, a notice dated 5. 3. 1988, was issued under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, terminating the lease. They pleaded that they are entitled for the relief of recovery of possession of the land, as well as damages for use and occupation of the same.

( 3 ) APPELLANTS resisted the suit. They did not dispute the ownership of the respondents. It was, however, pleaded t
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top