Management of State Bank of India, rep. by its Regional Manager, Visakhapatnam – Appellant
Versus
Industrial Tribunal -1, rep. by its Presiding officer, Hyderabad – Respondent
( 2 ) THE facts, to the extent necessary, are that the Government of India, vide proceedings dated 10-7-1991, referred the following dispute between the management of State Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as the employer ) and their workmen to the industrial Tribunal, (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal ), for adjudication:"whether the action of the management of State Bank of India, Regional Office, visakhapatnam in imposing the punishment of stoppage of two increments by way of cancellation with cumulative effect on Sri Barnalasankara rao, Messenger, in the Srikakulam branch, vide their order No. (3-0)/dpc/ vsp/rii/139 dated 14-11-1985 was justified? If not, to what relief the said workman is entitled to?"
KARNATAKA ELECTRICITY BOARD, BANGALORE Vs WORKMEN OF M/S.AMALGAMATED ELECTRIC COMPANY LTD., BELGATIM
Management of Glaxo India Ltd. Vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Guntur
Sri Ahmed Mohiddin Vs State Bank of Hyderabad
Subba Lakshmi Vs Honble Labour Court III, Hyderabad
A.N.Pandu Vs Management of Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd.rep.by its Executive Director
Divisional Manager, APSRTC Vs E.Raja Reddy
A.P.S.R.T.C. rep. by its Depot Manager, Palasa Depot, Srikakulam Dist Vs Mudidina Krishna Moorthy
Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Limited Vs S.C.PRASAD
S.K.SINGH Vs central Bank of India Limited
Engineering Laghu Udyog Employees Union Vs Judge, Labour Court and Industrial Tribunal
J.A.Naiksatam Vs Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court of Bombay
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.