SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 709

Management of State Bank of India, rep. by its Regional Manager, Visakhapatnam – Appellant
Versus
Industrial Tribunal -1, rep. by its Presiding officer, Hyderabad – Respondent


( 1 ) ARE Labour Courts/tribunals empowered to declare disciplinary action taken against a workman abinitiovold and, without examining the matter further, set aside the punishment imposed on such a workman by his employer, solely on the ground that a copy of the enquiry report had not been furnished and an opportunity to submit his objections thereto has been denied to the delinquent workman? this is the question which falls for consideration in this writ petition.

( 2 ) THE facts, to the extent necessary, are that the Government of India, vide proceedings dated 10-7-1991, referred the following dispute between the management of State Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as the employer ) and their workmen to the industrial Tribunal, (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal ), for adjudication:"whether the action of the management of State Bank of India, Regional Office, visakhapatnam in imposing the punishment of stoppage of two increments by way of cancellation with cumulative effect on Sri Barnalasankara rao, Messenger, in the Srikakulam branch, vide their order No. (3-0)/dpc/ vsp/rii/139 dated 14-11-1985 was justified? If not, to what relief the said workman is entitled to?"

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top