( 1 ) CIVIL Revision Petition No. 1022 of 2005 is directed against the order passed in i. A. No. 771 of 2005 in O. S. No. 26 of 2004 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, vijayawada, whereas Civil Revision Petition no. 1018 of 2005 is directed against the order passed in I. A. No. 772 of 2005.

( 2 ) DESPITE notice, none appears for the respondents.

( 3 ) FOR the sake of convenience parties to the Civil Revision Petitions are referred to as they were arrayed before the Court below.

( 4 ) SINCE both the Civil Revision Petitions arise out of the same suit, though orders were passed in two different Interlocutory applications, these two Revision Petitions are disposed of by this common Order.

( 5 ) THE sole grievance of the petitioners who are defendants in the suit is that two applications have been filed viz. ,i. A. Nos. 771 and 772 of 2005. Whereas I. A. No. 771 of 2005 is filed under Order 18 Rule 17 and under Section 151 of the Code of Civil procedure to recall P. W. 1 for purpose of marking the authorization letter dated 9-8-2003, I. A. No. 772 of 2005 is filed under order VII Rule 14 (3) and under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure to condone the delay and gra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document