C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
Mannepalli Mohan Rao – Appellant
Versus
P. V. Ramana – Respondent
( 2 ) THE main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is falsely implicated in the case for his having refused to accept the proposal of a compromise mooted by the State House officer, (who registered the case against the petitioner) in connection with a family dispute among the family members of the petitioner. It is his contention that since the allegations in the FIR do not disclose that any particular person was threatened or was intimidated by the petitioner, section 506 IPC is not attracted and since the knife allegedly seized from the possession of the petitioner is not beyond the length of the knife prescribed in the notification
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.