SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 756

C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
Mannepalli Mohan Rao – Appellant
Versus
P. V. Ramana – Respondent


( 1 ) ALLEGING that on 15-3-2004 at about 1. 30 p. m. , petitioner was found brandishing a curved knife on a public road hurling out abuses, giving out that persons coming near would be killed with the knife in his hand and thereby created panic in a public place, the Station House Office, i Town Police Station; Rajahmundry, registered a case in crime No. 127 of 2004 under Section 506 IPC and Under Section 25 of the Arms Act (for short the Act ) against the petitioner. This petition is filed to quash the said FIR.

( 2 ) THE main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is falsely implicated in the case for his having refused to accept the proposal of a compromise mooted by the State House officer, (who registered the case against the petitioner) in connection with a family dispute among the family members of the petitioner. It is his contention that since the allegations in the FIR do not disclose that any particular person was threatened or was intimidated by the petitioner, section 506 IPC is not attracted and since the knife allegedly seized from the possession of the petitioner is not beyond the length of the knife prescribed in the notification








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top