SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 747

K. Papadu – Appellant
Versus
Golagana Suryanarayana – Respondent


( 1 ) THE appellant is the plaintiff in O. S. No. 90 of 1991, on the file of the Court of Additional Subordinate judge, Srikakulam. He filed the suit for the relief of declaration of title and perpetual injunction, against the respondents, in respect of the suit schedule property, admeasuring Ac. 3-00 in Sy. No. 16/4 of derasam Village.

( 2 ) THE appellant pleaded that his grandfather, by name Kolagana Pydayya, was the owner of the land in Sy. No. 16/4, admeasuring Ac. 22-60 cents, and out of it, he gave Ac. 5-00 to one of his sons, narsimhulu. The appellant is one of the three sons of Narasimhulu, and in the family partition, he is said to have been allotted ac. 3-00 of land, in Sy. No. 16/4, and that his other brothers were allotted the remaining ac. 2-00 of land, in that survey number, and other properties held by Narasimhulu. He pleaded that the ownership of Pydayya was recognized, through important documents, such as fair adangal, prepared in the year 1953, and that the possession of the appellant over Ac. 3-00 of land, in that survey number, was recorded, year after year.

( 3 ) THE respondents, on the other hand, pleaded that the land in Sy. No. 16/4, was held by Sri Poosapat















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top