K. Papadu – Appellant
Versus
Golagana Suryanarayana – Respondent
( 2 ) THE appellant pleaded that his grandfather, by name Kolagana Pydayya, was the owner of the land in Sy. No. 16/4, admeasuring Ac. 22-60 cents, and out of it, he gave Ac. 5-00 to one of his sons, narsimhulu. The appellant is one of the three sons of Narasimhulu, and in the family partition, he is said to have been allotted ac. 3-00 of land, in Sy. No. 16/4, and that his other brothers were allotted the remaining ac. 2-00 of land, in that survey number, and other properties held by Narasimhulu. He pleaded that the ownership of Pydayya was recognized, through important documents, such as fair adangal, prepared in the year 1953, and that the possession of the appellant over Ac. 3-00 of land, in that survey number, was recorded, year after year.
( 3 ) THE respondents, on the other hand, pleaded that the land in Sy. No. 16/4, was held by Sri Poosapat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.