G.ROHINI
J. Satyasri Rambabu – Appellant
Versus
A. Anasuya – Respondent
( 2 ) THE brief facts are as under the respondents herein are the plaintiffs in the suit, which was filed seeking a decree for perpetual injunction restraining the defendant/revision petitionerfrom interfering with the suit schedule land The suit schedule land was described as Ac 2 20 guntas situated in Sy No 226 and another extent of ac 0 18 guntas situated in Sy No 227 of sarangapur village of Nizamabad District along with the plaint, the plaintiffs filed I A no. 486 of 2005 seeking temporary injunction. It is not in dispute that initially the Court below grantedad-interiminjunction. Subsequently on behalf of the defendant a memo dated 7-5-2005 was filed undertaking that he will not interfere with the property of the plaintiffs and that he would carry out his activity in the property as authorized by the Government. The said undertaking was placed on record and accordingly I. A. No. 486 of 2005 was closed. Subsequently the plaintiffs filed I. A. No. 731 of 2005 under Order XXXI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.