SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 821

G.ROHINI
J. Satyasri Rambabu – Appellant
Versus
A. Anasuya – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 13-6-2005 in I A No 731 of 2005 in IA No. 486 of 2005 in OS No 149 of 2005 on the file of the Court of Principal Junior Civil judge at Nizamabad

( 2 ) THE brief facts are as under the respondents herein are the plaintiffs in the suit, which was filed seeking a decree for perpetual injunction restraining the defendant/revision petitionerfrom interfering with the suit schedule land The suit schedule land was described as Ac 2 20 guntas situated in Sy No 226 and another extent of ac 0 18 guntas situated in Sy No 227 of sarangapur village of Nizamabad District along with the plaint, the plaintiffs filed I A no. 486 of 2005 seeking temporary injunction. It is not in dispute that initially the Court below grantedad-interiminjunction. Subsequently on behalf of the defendant a memo dated 7-5-2005 was filed undertaking that he will not interfere with the property of the plaintiffs and that he would carry out his activity in the property as authorized by the Government. The said undertaking was placed on record and accordingly I. A. No. 486 of 2005 was closed. Subsequently the plaintiffs filed I. A. No. 731 of 2005 under Order XXXI






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top