SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 829

B.SESHASAYANA REDDY
Puttur Gram Panchayat Puttur, Chittoor district – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) PUTTUR Gram Panchayat is the petitioner and it is represented by its Sarpanch. Conversion of Puttur Grampanchayath into Municipality is assailed in the writ petition. Consequently, cancellation of resolutions passed by the Grampanchayath opposing the upgradation of Grampanchayath to Municipality are also assailed in the writ petition.

( 2 ) THE Collector and District Magistrate-3rd respondent sent proposals regarding upgradation of Putur and surrounding eight Grampanchayats namely 1) Cherlopalli 2) Chinnarajukuppam 3) Radhapalem 4) Veerappareddipalem (Bathalavari Kandriga) 5) Namdimangalam and 6) Pillaripattu 7) Thimmapuram of Puttur Mandal and 8) Kondalcheruvu of Narayanavanam mandal as Puttur municipality. He also furnished a brief gist of area, population, density, economic importance and other factors to substantiate the proposals for conversation of the Grampanchayats as municipality. Thereupon, the Government issued Memo No. 2107/pts-IV/al/2005-1, dated 28-2-2005 to the District Panchayath officer to furnish resolutions of all the grampanchayaths for taking further action. In turn District Panchayath Officer-4th respondent requested the Divisional panchayath Officer to
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top