SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 808

B.PRAKASH RAO, G.YETHIRAJULU
General Manager, Singareni Collieries co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Industrial Trlbunal-1, hyderabad – Respondent


B. PRAKASH RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal, at the instance of the management, who filed the writ, is against the order, dated 25-9-2000, dismissing the said writ in W. P. No. 3213 of 1994, which was directed against the Award, dated 4-10-1993, passed in I. D. No. 63 of 1990 on the file of the industrial Tribunal-l, Hyderabad (for short the Tribunal ).

( 2 ) THE brief facts, which are necessary for disposal of this appeal, are that the second respondent was working as General Mazdoor category-l in the appellant-Corporation. He sought for allotment of a residential quarter, by an application dated 1 -7-1982 for allotting the quarter D-350, III Zone, since it fell vacant due to transfer of occupant, a Watchman, sri P. Rajaiah, however, according to him, on the express consent given by one of his officers, he got into and occupied the residential quarter No. D-350, III Zone and the house rent allowance has not been collected from him. However, the appellant has initiated action for eviction against the second respondent for occupying such a residential quarter, without any proper allotment. According to the appellant, despite the directions given to vacate the residential quarter, for whi







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top