P.SWAROOP REDDY, D.S.R.VERMA
Varikoti Nagaraju – Appellant
Versus
Varikoti Bhadraiah – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD both sides
( 2 ) THOUGH the matter is listed under the caption "interlocutory", with consent of both parties, the mam Civil Miscellaneous Appeal itself is heard and disposed of by this judgment
( 3 ) THIS Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the order and decree, dated 6-7-2005, passed by the III Additional District judge, Warangal, disposing of the application i A No. 126 of 2004 in OS. No 4 of 2004, filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of civil Procedure seeking to grant ad interim injunction restraining the respondents therein from in any way alienating the petition schedule properties or inducting third parties into the petition schedule properties till the disposal of the suit.
( 4 ) THE appellants are plaintiffs and respondent Nos. 1 to 3 are defendant Nos. 6, 14, 15 and respondent Nos. 4 to 7 are defendant Nos. 16 to 19, respectively.
( 5 ) FOR the sake of convenience, in this judgment, the appellants, respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and respondent Nos. 4 to 7 will be referred to as "the plaintiffs", "defendant Nos. 6, 14 and 15" and "defendant Nos. 16 to 19", respectively.
( 6 ) THE factual background is that an extent of Ac. 17-28 gu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.