SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 975

G.CHANDRAIAH
P. Himabindu – Appellant
Versus
P. Jayasimharaja – Respondent


( 1 ) HEARD both the counsel.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the wife. She filed this petition under Section 24 of C. P. C. seeking withdrawal of O. P. No. 13/2004 filed by the respondent, who is her husband, for restitution of conjugal rights and O. S. No. 153/2004 filed by her for maintenance and for return of plaint A and B Schedule articles and documents, both on the file of Principal Senior civil Judge, Court, Chittoor and to transfer both the matters to Family Court, Hyderabad.

( 3 ) THE petitioner in the affidavit filed in support of the transfer petition stated that the marriage of the petitioner with the respondent was performed on 18-12-2000 in Hotel viceroy, Hyderabad as per Hindu customs and rites. Subsequent to the marriage, the respondent and his family members have harassed the petitioner for dowry and the respondent left the petitioner at Hyderabad and the marriage is also not consummated. The respondent with a view to get rid of the petitioner, filed O. P. No. 13/2004 for restitution of conjugal rights, though he has no interest. The petitioner filed counter in the matter and contesting the same. Petitioner also filed o. S. No. 153/2004 on the file of same court for relie













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top