SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 1051

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Syed Pasha – Appellant
Versus
G. B. Prahalad Rao – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS C. R. P. is filed against the order, dated 26. 12. 2003, in I. A. No. 689 of 2003, in O. S. No. 375 of 2003, on the file of the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Sangareddy. The defendant in the suit is the petitioner and the sole plaintiff is the respondent herein. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to, as arrayed, in the suit.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff filed O. S. No. 375 of 2002, against the defendant, for recovery of a sum of Rs. 76,926/-, in. the trial court, by invoking the procedure under Order 37 Rule 4 C. P. C. An ex parte decree was passed on 15. 11. 2002. The defendant filed i. A. No. 689 of 2003, under Rule 4 of Order 37 CPC, with a prayer to set aside the ex parte decree, and sought permission to contest the suit, by filing the written statement. The application was opposed by the plaintiff. Through its order, dated 26. 1. 2. 2003, the trial court dismissed the application.

( 3 ) SRI M. Ram Mohan, learned counsel for the defendant, submits that the summons in the suit were served upon the defendant on 7. 10. 2002, and that appearance was entered on 23. 10. 2002. He contends that notwithstanding this development, the plaintiff filed a memo o








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top