SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 1033

D.S.R.VERMA, P.SWAROOP REDDY
Y. Babu Rao – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


D. S. R. VARMA, J, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition is filed challenging the order, dated 23-3-2001, passed by the Chief Justice of this Court in arbitration Appeal No. 41 of 2000 refusing the appointment of an Arbitrator.

( 2 ) IN normal course, against the impugned order, a writ petition would lie to the High Court under Article-226 of the constitution of India as per the judgment of the Apex Court in Konkan Railway Corpn. Ltd. and another v. Rani Construction pvt. Ltd. , (2000) 8 SCC 159. But the said judgment had been overruled by a Larger bench of the Apex Court in M/s. S. B. P. and Co. v. Patel Engineering Ltd. and another, 2006 (1) ALD 10 (SC) = 2005 (1) decisions Today (SC) 105 (LB), wherein it was held that the order of the Chief justice either appointing an Arbitrator or rejecting the application filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, has to be challenged only before the Apex court the same being a judicial order. The Apex Court also made it explicitly clear that the above judgment would come into effect from 26-10-2005.

( 3 ) IN view of the judgment of the apex Court in M/s. S. B. P. and Co. (supra), the present writ petition is liable to be dism

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top