SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 1132

T.CH.SURYA RAO
K. Narayana Raju – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


( 1 ) APPLICANT seeks appointment of an independent arbitratorundersection 11, subsections (5) and (6) of the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996.

( 2 ) PURSUANT to the tender notice, dated 19-7-1999, issued by the respondent for construction of pile foundations, R. C. C. columns and superstructure between Chirala and Stuartpuram railway station, Vijayawada, gudur section, the petitioner submitted his negotiated offer on 11-1-2000 and respondents accepted the same on 19-1 -2000. As perthe terms of the agreement, the work should be completed within 12 months from the date of acceptance letter i. e. , on or before 18-1-2001. Initially value of the work was Rs. 1,54,62,330/- The parties entered into an agreement bearing n0. 2/cao/c/sc/2000 on 7-2-2000. The petitioner deposited an amount of Rs. 53,358/- towards EMD out of three crores to be deposited and requested the respondents to recoverthe balance amounts from his running bills and accordingly they recovered an amount of Rs. 2,46,642/ -. The quantities mentioned in the tender schedule are only approximate and thev are liable to be varied up to 25% beyond the agreement at the time of actual execution of the work. Due to improper








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top