SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 1120

T.CH.SURYA RAO
Waheed Bin Mohd. – Appellant
Versus
Niazunnisa begum – Respondent


( 1 ) THE instant revision petition is directed against the order dated 1-7-2005 passed by the learned Principal Junior Civil judge, Karimnagar, in LA. No. 989 of 2005 in O. S. No. 361 of 2003.

( 2 ) THE unsuccessful petitioner is the revision petitioner herein and he is the defendant in the suit O. S. No. 361 of 2003 filed by the respondent herein seeking the relief of eviction of the defendant from the suit schedule shop No. 15, for recovery of an amount of Rs. 16,000/- as arrears of rent and for profits at Rs. 4,000/- per month with effect from 1-7-2003 by way of damages for unlawful use and occupation by the defendant. While the suit was pending adjudication before the trial Court, the defendant filed LA. No. 989 of 2005 requesting the Court to return the plaint. That application having been resisted by the plaintiff and after having heard on either side, under the impugned order, came to be dismissed. The revision petitioner is, therefore, seeking to assail the same.

( 3 ) THE suit O. S. No. 361 of 2003 was filed by the plaintiff on the premise that she was the landlord of the demised premises and the defendant was the tenant she having let out the premises to him on a monthly













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top