SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 1111

T.CH.SURYA RAO
Jayalakshmi Constructions, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Nawab Behboob Ali Khan – Respondent


( 1 ) BOTH these revision petitions can be disposed of together since identical questions of law and fact are involved and as the parties are same.

( 2 ) TWO applications were filed seeking appointment of Commissioner in two suits pending adjudication between the parties inter se in the same Court. By means of an identical order although passed separately in two separate petitions, the court below appointed a Commissioner to note down the physical features of the suit schedule mentioned properties with a direction to draw a rough sketch and to take photographs, if necessary.

( 3 ) THE orders appointing Commissioner in both the applications are now being sought" to be assailed solely on the premise that such an appointment would tantamount to fishing in evidence. The suits in between the parties appear to have been filed seeking the relief of perpetual injunction. In the concomitant petitions filed, the parties sought for temporary injunctions. When those applications had been coming up for enquiry and adjudication, separate petitions were filed seeking appointment of a Commissioner.

( 4 ) THE learned Counsel appearing for the revision petitioners represents that the appointment of









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top