SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 4

D.S.R.VERMA
Maldar Mahaboob Sab – Appellant
Versus
Allabakash – Respondent


D. S. R. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) THOUGH the matter is listed under the caption "for Admission", with consent of the learned counsel for both the parties, the main Civil Revision Petition itself is disposed of by this order.

( 2 ) HEARD both sides.

( 3 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order and decree, dated 12-11-2002, passed by the Senior Civil Judge at adoni, Kurnool District, rejecting the application in I. A. No. 125 of 2002 in O. S. No. 38 of 1965, filed under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure to amend the decree in o. S. No. 38 of 1965 specifying the entitlement of the share of each of the petitioners and the respondents therein, in the suit schedule properties.

( 4 ) THE petitioners are the defendants (brought on record as legal representatives of defendant No. 3) and the respondent is the plaintiff. The suit was filed for partition.

( 5 ) FOR the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as arrayed in the suit.

( 6 ) THE undisputed facts are that the plaintiff filed the suit for partition and separate possession of her 1/13th share in the suit schedule properties on the file of Senior Civil Judge at Adoni, Kurnool District. The said suit was

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top