SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 67

K.C.BHANU, BILAL NAZKI
Kasarabada Rajeswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. by Public Prosecutor – Respondent


BILAL NAZKI, J.

( 1 ) THESE petitions have been filed by different persons who are accused in different cases for quashing the proceedings in terms of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal procedure. Charge-sheets were filed against the accused persons for having committed offences punishable under Section 7 (i) of the essential Commodities Act r/w. Sections 26 and 28 of the A. P. Petroleum Products (Licensing and Regulation of Supplies) Act, 1980 and Section 411 of the Indian Penal code. They were also accused of having committed offences under Sections 120-B, 407, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472 and 474 of the indian Penal Code.

( 2 ) THE contention of the petitioners before the learned Single Judge of this Court appears to have been that a Special Court constituted under the provisions of Section 12-A of the essential Commodities Act cannot try the cases involving offences under Indian Penal code along with offences under the Essential commodities Act. After noting down various judgments the learned single Judge framed the following question:"whether a special Court constituted under the provisions of Section 12-A of the Essential Commodities Act can try other offences punishable under th



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top