SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 63

P.S.NARAYANA
Abdul Khader alias Abdul Rauf – Appellant
Versus
Aktharunnisa Begum – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri Damodar Rao, the learned Counsel representing the Revision petitioners and Sri T. V. Ramana Rao, representing sri V. K. Deshpande, Counsel representing the respondents.

( 2 ) THE simple question raised in the present Civil Revision Petition is whether the learned Junior Civil Judge, Utnoor can straight away receive the documents filed along with a simple memo without observing the procedure contemplated by the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, hereinafter in short referred to as "code".

( 3 ) THE Revision petitioners herein as petitioners/defendants 1 to 5 moved I. A. No. 20/2003 in O. S. No. 1/91 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Utnoor under Section 151 of the Code not to receive documents specified as 1 to 4 in evidence. Several allegations relating to the nature of the documents and also the ground that these are fabricated documents had been averred and this question may not be very relevant for the present purpose.

( 4 ) RESPONDENTS filed a counter denying the allegations and specific stand was taken that such objection cannot be raised by the petitioners in receiving the documents since the same would be contrary to the orders made







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top