SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 94

N.V.RAMANA
D. Vidya Sagar Rao – Appellant
Versus
K. Indira Devi – Respondent


N. V. RAMANA, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiffs are the respondents and the defendants the petitioners. The parties shall be referred to by the status in the suit. PLEADINGS IN BRIEF AS DISCLOSED by RECORD

( 2 ) THE pleadings on record disclose that the plaintiffs and the defendants are claiming to be owning an extent of Acs. 4-10 guntas and Acs. 10-00 of land in Sy. Nos. 484, 485 and 486 of Bachupally village, Ranga Reddy district. While the claim of the plaintiffs is based on the sale deed of the year 1967, while that of the defendants, is based on the sale deeds from the year 1993 and onwards. It appears that when the defendants tried to interfere with the possessions of the plaintiffs, the plaintiffs filed the suit O. S. No. 239 of 2000 on the file of the Principal senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, praying to grant permanent injunction restraining the defendants, from interfering with their extent of land. While the suit is pending, the plaintiffs moved an application in I. A. No. 2089 of 2001 under Order XXVI rule 9 read with Section 151 of the Code of civil Procedure, 1908 praying to appoint a surveyor, contending that there are boundary disputes between the plaintiffs and the de























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top