N.V.RAMANA
D. Vidya Sagar Rao – Appellant
Versus
K. Indira Devi – Respondent
( 1 ) THE plaintiffs are the respondents and the defendants the petitioners. The parties shall be referred to by the status in the suit. PLEADINGS IN BRIEF AS DISCLOSED by RECORD
( 2 ) THE pleadings on record disclose that the plaintiffs and the defendants are claiming to be owning an extent of Acs. 4-10 guntas and Acs. 10-00 of land in Sy. Nos. 484, 485 and 486 of Bachupally village, Ranga Reddy district. While the claim of the plaintiffs is based on the sale deed of the year 1967, while that of the defendants, is based on the sale deeds from the year 1993 and onwards. It appears that when the defendants tried to interfere with the possessions of the plaintiffs, the plaintiffs filed the suit O. S. No. 239 of 2000 on the file of the Principal senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, praying to grant permanent injunction restraining the defendants, from interfering with their extent of land. While the suit is pending, the plaintiffs moved an application in I. A. No. 2089 of 2001 under Order XXVI rule 9 read with Section 151 of the Code of civil Procedure, 1908 praying to appoint a surveyor, contending that there are boundary disputes between the plaintiffs and the de
JAGADISH CHANDRA DEO V. GOUR HARI MAHATO
P.Pedda Saidaiah Vs T.Padmavathi Bal
Narain Das Vs IInd Addl.Dist.Judge, Moradabad
N.ANNAPPA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA
JAGADISH CHANDRA DEO V. GOUR HAD MAHATO
JAGADISH CHANDRA DEO V. GOUR HARI MAHATO AND SURYYA V. BALA GANGADHARA
Bongu Ramulu Vs Gudur Narender Reddy
Narain Das Vs IInd Addl.Dist.Judge, Moradabad
DHANWANTI JOSHI Vs MADHAV UNDE
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.