SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 86

A.GOPAL REDDY
V. Lingamma – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


A. GOPAL REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE point that falls for adjudication in both the writ petitions is common and they are disposed of by this common order.

( 2 ) PETITIONERS claim that one Shaheen Aziz Ahmed was allotted a plot admeasuring Ac. 2. 30 gts. in Plot No. 10 of erstwhile Jubilee Hills Municipality and from whom the petitioners father Mr. V. Malla Reddy purchased the said property on 12-3-1358 Fasli corresponding to the year 1948 and since from the date pf purchase he is in continuous possession. When several bogus claims were made with regard to allotments by the erstwhile Nizam Government in Jubilee Hills area, the 1st respondent instituted an enquiry into such claims of allotment and after elaborate enquiry the 1st respondent through his Memo No. 3933/02/64-17 dated 6-12-1967 held that 41 individuals who claim for assignment/allotment were held to be legal and valid, wherein the petitioners father s vendor is at SI. No. 15 over an extent of Ac. 2. 30 gts, in the annexure annexed to the said proceedings. It is stated that during the year 1979-80 the 1st and 2nd respondents published the Town Survey Records of Hyderabad City, wherein also the ownership and possession of V. Malla

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top