D.S.R.VERMA
Mulla Alamsabgari Dastigiri – Appellant
Versus
B. Pullamma – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS revision is filed challenging the docket order dated 19-8-2003 passed by the court of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda in o. S. No. 15/2001. By the impugned order, the court below overruled the objection raised by the 1st defendant while recording the evidence of P. W. 1, with regard to admissibility of a document i. e. , a conveyance agreement. Aggrieved by the same, the 1st defendant filed this revision petition.
( 2 ) IT is settled law that any document can be received by the court subject to objection and a finding can be recorded with regard to its admissibility and, if aggrieved, the same can be challenged in appeal. From the record it could be seen that in the evidence of P. W. 1, an unregistered re-conveyance document was sought to be marked and the 1 st defendant objected to the marking of the same, on the ground that the said document was not registered. As stated above, the court below overruled the objection of the 1st defendant and allowed the document to be marked on the ground that registration is not required for re-conveyance agreement under Section 17 of the Registration Act.
( 3 ) THE learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contende
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.