SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 130

D.S.R.VERMA
Mulla Alamsabgari Dastigiri – Appellant
Versus
B. Pullamma – Respondent


D. S. R. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is filed challenging the docket order dated 19-8-2003 passed by the court of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda in o. S. No. 15/2001. By the impugned order, the court below overruled the objection raised by the 1st defendant while recording the evidence of P. W. 1, with regard to admissibility of a document i. e. , a conveyance agreement. Aggrieved by the same, the 1st defendant filed this revision petition.

( 2 ) IT is settled law that any document can be received by the court subject to objection and a finding can be recorded with regard to its admissibility and, if aggrieved, the same can be challenged in appeal. From the record it could be seen that in the evidence of P. W. 1, an unregistered re-conveyance document was sought to be marked and the 1 st defendant objected to the marking of the same, on the ground that the said document was not registered. As stated above, the court below overruled the objection of the 1st defendant and allowed the document to be marked on the ground that registration is not required for re-conveyance agreement under Section 17 of the Registration Act.

( 3 ) THE learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contende





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top