SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 100

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
N. Bal Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad East – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONERS claim to be the owners of lands in Survey Nos. 34/c, 35/a, 36, 37/a and 38/b admeasuring Acs. 40-20 guntas situated at Kundanpally Village, Keesara mandal, Ranga Reddy District. They have approached the Mandal Revenue Officer (MRO), Keesaragutta, for making necessary entries by way of mutation and for issuance of pattedar pass books in respect of the said lands. Through his proceedings dated 16-7-2000, the M. R. O. had effected mutations in favour of the petitioners in the concerned records and issued pattedar pass books. Aggrieved by the same, respondents 2 to 22 preferred an appeal before the r. D. O. , Hyderabad East-first respondent herein together with an application for grant of interim orders. The first respondent took the appeal on file and passed an interim order dated 30-1-2003 suspending the pattedar passbooks issued by the M. R. O. in favour of the petitioners herein. Petitioners challenge the same.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the petitioners, pattedar passbooks are issued under Section 6-A of the A. P. Rights in Land and Pattedar Pass books Act, 1971 (for short "the Act") and no appeal is provided against the same. It is also their case t









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top