SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 168

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Sk. Rasool Bee – Appellant
Versus
Fathima Bee (Died) – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER filed O. S. No. 8 of 1998 in the court of Senior Civil Judge at Suryapet against the respondents herein for the relief of partition and other ancillary reliefs. The trial of the suit commenced and the recording of the evidence was closed. At that stage, the respondents filed I. A. No. 423 of 2002 to reopen the evidence and I. A. No. 453 of 2002 to summon the Mandal Revenue inspector, Noothankal as a witness. Both the ias were allowed and the Mandal Revenue inspector was examined as D. W. 6. Through him, documents Exs. B-8 to B-13 were marked.

( 2 ) PETITIONER wanted to verify the correctness and genuinity of documents exs. B-8 to B-13. She has submitted an application to the office of the Mandal revenue Officer, Suryapet, to furnish certified copies of the said documents. She was replied through a letter dt. 17-10-2002 by the Mandal Revenue Officer, Suryapet, stating that the record pertaining to the said documents is not traceable.

( 3 ) SUSPECTING the genuinity and authenticity of Exs. B-8 to B-13, she filed i. A. No. 569 of 2002 to reopen the evidence and I. A. No. 570 of 2002 to summon the mandal Revenue Officer, Suryapet. Through identica




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top