( 1 ) THE controversy between the parties is in relation to the stay of suit praying for the relief of perpetual injunction in relation to a trade Mark Azam Jadi Beedi.

( 2 ) RESPONDENTS in the Civil Revision petition moved C. M. P. No. 37/2004 in c. M. P. No. 19983/2003 in the present Civil revision Petition to vacate the interim suspension made in C. M. P. No. 19983/2003. At that stage, with the consent of both the counsel, the Civil Revision Petition itself was heard finally.

( 3 ) THE Revision petitioners/respondents in I. A. No. 163/2003 in O. S. No. 88/2001 on the file of XIV Additional Chief Judge, City civil Court, Hyderabad-Fast Track Court;as plaintiffs filed the suit O. S. No. 88/2001 praying for the relief of permanent injunction in favour of plaintiffs restraining the defendants, their men, agents, servants, employees or any one claiming under or through them from in any way manufacturing, selling, supplying and dealing with the plaintiff proprietary registered Trade Mark Azam Jadi Beedi from any territory by taking police assistance and for costs of the suit. It is available on record that the said plaintiffs also moved an application I. A. No. 1000/