SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 205

A.GOPAL REDDY
Pochi Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer, vikarabad – Respondent


A. GOPAL REDDY, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER by invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction seeks a Mandamus to declare the order passed by the first respondent in proceedings No. C/1675/00 dated 6-9-2003 as illegal and arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and to set aside the same. In fact the petitioner has to seek a writ of Certiorari and not a Mandamus as prayed by him.

( 2 ) THE petitioner who obtained an order for validating an unregistered sale deed from the Mandal Revenue Officer by an order dated 25-1-1999 in file No. B/3082/98 under section 5-A of A. P. Rights in Land and pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971. Aggrieved by the same, the original landlord-3rd respondent herein, from whom the petitioner claims to have purchased, filed an appeal under Section 5-B before the Revenue divisional Officer, Vikarabad Division with an application to condone the delay of 482 days under Section 5 of the Limitation Act by enclosing a medical certificate issued from the doctor. Initially, the Revenue Divisional officer condoned the delay by an order dated 10-12-2002. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 25666 of 2002. The said Writ Petition was allowed by this co








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top