SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 218

B.S.A.SWAMY
Kalal Thimmanna – Appellant
Versus
Krishna reddy – Respondent


B. S. A. SWAMY, J.

( 1 ) BOTH the appeals can be disposed of by a common judgment, since the disputed property is one and the same and it is between the same parties.

( 2 ) THE parties are referred as arrayed in O. S. No. 54 of 1986 for the sake of convenience.

( 3 ) THE defendants in O. S. No. 54 of 1986 initially filed O. S. No. 25 of 1986 on the file of District Munsif Court, Atmakur, seeking permanent injunction restraining the plaintiffs in this suit (Defendants therein) from interfering with their possession over the suit schedule properties (i. e. ,) Ac. 6-08 gts. , of land in Sy. No. l38/a and in sy. No. 138/aa for an extent of Ac. 6-07 gts. , of Motlampally Village, Atmakur Revenue mandal, Mahabubnagar District by contending that they purchased these properties for a consideration of Rs. 1,800. 00 about 25 years back and since then they are in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the properties. They further stated that their sale deed was lost due to heavy rains in the year 1964 and therefore the original sale deed could not be filed in the Honourable Court, and the defendants (i. e. ,) Kalal Thimmanna and Pedda Ramulu sons of late Thimmanna and Balachandrudu, who have no


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top