L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS case discloses an instance of highhandedness and flagrant violation of known principles of law and procedure prescribed under the relevant statutes; by the Revenue and Police Authorities of the State, who are supposed to ensure implementation of the same.

( 2 ) THE land in Sy. Nos. 90/1, 90/2 and 92, admeasuring about Acs. 33. 08 gts of gachibowli village was purchased by a private Limited Company, by name m/s. Industrial and Agricultural Engineering company (for short the Company) through a sale deed dated 1-10-1962. The extent of land in Sy. No. 92 is Acs. 16. 10 gts. The company sold this in favour of seventeen individuals through separate sale deeds and the land was assigned sub-divisions from 92/2 to 92/18, indicating the extents purchased under the various sale deeds. One Mr. R. Satyanarayana Reddy purchased an extent of Ac. 2. 00 gts in sy. No. 92/2. The petitioners purchased the same in different extents from the transferees of Satyanarayana Reddy. The petitioners claim to be in possession of ac. 1. 34 gts of land in Sy. No. 92/2.

( 3 ) ADJOINING the land in Sy. No. 92, there is a vast extent of land belonging to the government in Sy. No. 91

Click Here to Read the rest of this document