T.CH.SURYA RAO
K. Matura Bai – Appellant
Versus
A. Shiva nageswar Rao – Respondent
( 1 ) SINCE all the three appeals arise out of one and the same judgment dated 7. 7. 1999 passed by the learned Chief Judge, City Civil Court, hyderabad, in OP No. 129 of 1996, they can be disposed of together.
( 2 ) THE second respondent/insurer is the appellant in C. M. A. No. 3021/1999, the third respondent/apsrtc ( the Corporation for brevity) is the appellant in C. M. A. No. 1069/2000 and the claimants are the appellants in C. M. A. No. 2550/1999. The insurer and the Corporation in the respective appeals are assailing the finding of the tribunal below that the Respondents 1 to 3 are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation. In addition thereto, the corporation is assailing the quantum of compensation assessed by the Tribunal. The claimants are questioning the inadequaeyof the compensation.
( 3 ) THE claimants filed O. P. No. 129 of 1996 claiming a compensation of Rs. 4 lakhs for the death of the husband of the first claimant and father of the Claimants 2 and 3 in a motor accident that occurred on 8. 1. 1996 at about 7. 20 p. m. , on account of the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the bus bearing No. AP-7t-2288 owned by the first responde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.