SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 278

D.S.R.VERMA
Inguva Saraswathi – Appellant
Versus
Vaddemani Sivaramakrishnarao – Respondent


D. S. R. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Appeal Suit is directed against the judgment and decree, dated 20-04-1996, in o. S. No. 17 of 1989, passed by the subordinate Judge at Rajampet, Cuddapah district.

( 2 ) THE unsuccessful plaintiff is the appellant herein. The suit was filed for declaration of right and title of the plaintiff and the fifth defendant over plaint A and B schedule properties, for delivery of possession thereof after evicting the defendants 1 to 4 and for mesne profits.

( 3 ) FOR the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as arrayed in the suit.

( 4 ) THE suit was originally instituted by one sridharam Venkataramaiah, who died during the pendency of the trial. Hence, the second plaintiff came on record as legatee of the deceased first plaintiff through a Will, dated 17-04-1989, and continued the suit and consequently, the plaint was also amended. Inasmuch as the original plaintiff died, the averments made in the original plaint are of not much significant and since the second plaintiff who stepped into the shoes of the deceased first plaintiff as legatee, the averments made in the amended plaint that are more relevant, in brief, are as under.

( 5 ) THE mother o























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top