SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 377

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Korru Reddi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
M. Suresh Kumar Reddy – Respondent


( 1 ) THE first respondent filed O. S. No. 80 of 1996 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalle for recovery of Rs. 90,625/- against the respondents 2, 3 and 4. The suit was decreed on 16-09-1998. Since the respondents 2, 3 and 4 did not satisfy the decree, the first respondent initiated execution proceedings in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalle, which in turn, were transferred to the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Punganur and numbered as E. P. No. 16 of 1999. Certain items of landed property belonging to the fourth respondent were attached. When further steps were in progress, the appellant filed E. A. No. 32 of 2000 under Order XX1 Rule 58 C. P. C.

( 2 ) THE appellant contended that he entered into an agreement of sale with the fourth respondent on 05-08-1998 to purchase items 8 to 12 of the E. P. Schedule, for a consideration of Rs. 40,000/- and an amount of Rs. 35,000/- was already paid. On the strength of this agreement, he claimed that the said items of property cannot be proceeded with. The E. A. was resisted by the first respondent. Through its orders dated 23-04-2001, the executing Court dismissed the E. A. Aggrieved thereby, the appellant filed A. S. N





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top