( 1 ) AGGRIEVED by the order dated 17-4-2003, passed by the II Additional District Judge, ranga Reddy District at L. B. Nagar, hyderabad, in O. S. No. 26 of 2002, holding that the document dated 3-6-1977, which is sought to be introduced in evidence, as not admissible and consequently refusing to receive and mark the same, the petitioners who are the plaintiffs filed this C. R. P.

( 2 ) A perusal of the order and other material on record, would disclose that the plaintiffs filed suit O. S. No. 26 of 2002 against the defendants for partition of the suit schedule property. According to the plaintiffs, defendant No. 1 and the plaintiffs are sons of one late Sattaiah. Defendant no. 2 is the wife of defendant No. 1. According to the plaintiffs, their father is the absolute owner and possessor of the suit schedule property and when he failed to pay arrears of rentals in excise business, the government auctioned the suit properties. Initially, the said property was purchased by one Tirumalachari. Later, father of defendant no. 1 (sic. 2), namely Subodh Kishan purchased the property in 1968 from the auction purchaser. Later when the father of the plaintiffs intended to purc