B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) SINCE in all these writ appeals and writ petitions, the subject matter and the questions that arise for consideration are inter-related, they may be disposed of by this common judgment. W. A. No. 1039 of 2002:

( 2 ) THE unsuccessful writ petitioners are the appellants in this writ appeal preferred against the order passed in W. P. No. 24647 of 2001 dated 4-6-2002 holding that g. O. Ms. No. 50, Public Enterprises (II) department, dated 15-11-2001, does not suffer from any illegality or legal infirmity.

( 3 ) THE appellants herein filed the writ petition invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of Inida, with a prayer to issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring G. O. Ms. No. 50, Public Enterprises (II) Department, dated 15-11-2001, as illegal and void.

( 4 ) THE appellants represent the employees working in various categories in the A. P. State Irrigation Development corporation Limited (for short the corporation ). The Corporation is one of the state Level Public Enterprises and it is a wholly owned A. P. Government Company, registered under the provisions of the companies Act, 1956. The primary

Click Here to Read the rest of this document