SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 505

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Miryala Kavitha Yadainma – Appellant
Versus
Miryala Krishnaiah – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS civil revision petition is filed against the order dated 31. 1. 2004 in la. No. 506 of 2003 in O. P. No. 73 of 2002 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, miryalaguda. Through the order under revision, the Trial Court dismissed the application filed under Section 5 of the limitation Act to condone delay of 122 days in presenting the application under Order IX, Rule 13 of the Code of civil Procedure.

( 2 ) THE respondent is the husband of the petitioner. He filed O. P. No. 73 of 2002 in the Trial Court under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking divorce on the ground that the petitioner was a patient suffering from the disease of epilepsy, her behaviour was violent and that her conduct has become unbearable for him. O. P. was decreed ex parte on 12. 3. 2003. The petitioner filed an application under Order IX, Rule 13 of the Code of civil Procedure to set aside the ex parte decree. Since there was delay of 122 days in presenting the said application, she filed LA. No. 506 of 2003 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. She pleaded that as soon as she received the notice in O. P. , she engaged an advocate and filed vakalat on 19. 12. 2002. She stated










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top