SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 521

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
P. Narasimha Reddy – Appellant
Versus
K. Ramachander – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS C. M. A is filed under Section 30 of the Workmen s Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) against the order dated 20-5-2001, passed by the Commissioner for Workmen s compensation and Assistant Commissioner of labour-l (hereinafter referred to as the commissioner ), in W. C. No. 82 of 1999, dismissing the claim of the appellants.

( 2 ) W. C. NO. 82 of 1999 was presented before the Commissioner alleging that the son of appellants 1 and 2, and brother of appellant No. 3 by name, Mahipal Reddy, was employed as Driver of a seven-seater auto bearing NO. AP-23-T-5214, belonging to the 1st respondent. It was alleged that accident occurred on account of the collision of the said vehicle with another unknown vehicle at 3. 00 a. m. on 29-9-1999, when it was proceeding from Patancheru to ghanpur, and that the said Mahipal reddy died in the accident. A sum of rs. 2,50,0007- was claimed as compensation, by stating that the deceased was aged 20 years at the time of accident and that he was being paid the salary of rs. 2,000/- per month. The vehicle was insured with the 2nd respondent.

( 3 ) THE 1st respondent filed counter affidavit admitti














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top