SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 520

C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
Md. Rasheed – Appellant
Versus
Susheela Agarwal – Respondent


C. Y. SOMAYAJULU, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANT filed a claim petition alleging that on 19. 10. 1995 when his auto bearing No. AP-10t-934, being driven by Mohd. Iqbal, reached near Bidar crossroads, vehicle bearing No. AP1 IT -8499 belonging to first respondent and insured with the second respondent, came in the opposite direction in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against his auto resulting in extensive damage thereto. He spent rs. 35,000/- to get his auto repaired, after spending Rs. 8,500/- towards towing charges. Since his auto was in the garage for repairs for six months, he lost an income of rs. 15,000/ -. So, he is entitled to Rs. 58,500/- as damages from the respondents. First respondent choose to remain ex parte, both before the Tribunal and this Court. Second respondent filed a counter contesting the claim of the appellant. In support of his case appellant examined himself as P. W. 1 and marked Exs. A. l to A. 5. Second respondent did not adduce any oral evidence but marked ex. B. 1 by consent. The Tribunal held that the accident occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the vehicle belonging to first respondent but dismissed the claim of the appellant on












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top