SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 618

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Reddys Laboratories Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Pulletikurthi Varaha Chandra Bose – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE five Tr. C. M. Ps. arise under similar circumstances though with slight differences as to facts. Hence, they are disposed of through a common order.

( 2 ) THESE Tr. C. M. Ps. are filed seeking transfer of O. S. Nos. 240, 244 and 245 of 2003 on the file of Principal Senior Civil judge, Rajahmundry, O. S. No. 242 of 2003 on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge, rajahmundry and O. S. No. 186 of 2003 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, ramachandrapuram, East Godavari District. Three suits on the file of Principal Senior civil Judge, Rajahmundry, were filed by one v. Hanumantha Rao against two defendants therein for recovery of certain amounts. O. S. No. 244 of 2003 is filed by one P. Varaha chandra Bose and O. S. No. 186 of 2003 is filed by one V. Satyanarayana for recovery of certain amounts against the respective defendants. In all the suits, the respective plaintiffs filed applications under Order 38 cpc and obtained orders of attachment before judgment in relation to certain fixed deposits in the post offices standing in the names of respective defendants.

( 3 ) THE petitioner is a third party to all the suits. It is a company incorporated un








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top