SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 608

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
G. Vijayalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Progressive Finance Corporation, Secunderabad – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS CRP is filed against the order passed by the learned I Additional chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, in CMA No. 38 of 1998, dated 4-5-2001. The C. M. A. , in turn, was filed against the order dated 21-3-1998 passed by the Court of I Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, secunderabad, in E. A. No. 103 of 1997 in e. P. No. 93 of 1997.

( 2 ) THE respondent filed O. S. No. 933 of 1995 in the Court of I Assistant Judge, city Civil Court, Secunderabad, against the husband of the petitioner for recovery of about Rs. 35,000/ -. The suit was decreed ex parte on 19-8-1996. Since the decree was not complied with, respondent filed E. P. No. 93 of 1997. A Car bearing No. AP 9 C 354 (Maruti) was attached by the executing court. The petitioner filed E. A. No. 103 of 1997 under Rule 58 of Order 21 C. P. C. It was her case that the car was purchased by her, and that the registration also stands in her name. She sought for raising of the attachment. The respondent resisted the application. The executing Court rejected the claim of the petitioner through its order dated 21-3-1998. In C. M. A. No. 38 of 1998, preferred by the petitioner, the order of the executi








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top