SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 602

C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
Vachala – Appellant
Versus
V. R. Kumar – Respondent


C. Y. SOMAYAJULU, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANTS, who are the widow and children of Dorairaj (the deceased), who died due to an accident caused by an auto trolley belonging to the first respondent and insured with the second respondent, have preferred a claim petition for Rs. 1,50,000/ -. Respondents filed counters contesting the claim petition. In support of the case of the appellants, first appellant was examined as P. W. 1 and Exs. A. l and a. 2 were marked. No oral evidence was adduced by the respondents but Exs. B. 1 and B. 2 were marked by consent. The tribunal, having held that the accident occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the auto belonging to the first respondent, passed an award for rs. 1,35,000/- but accepting the contention of the second respondent that it is not liable to pay compensation because the deceased was not travelling in a goods vehicle, exempted the second respondent from its liability. Aggrieved by the Tribunal, exonerating the second respondent from its liability, this appeal is preferred by the claimants.

( 2 ) THE point for consideration is whether the second respondent is liable to pay the compensation payable to the appellants?

( 3 )




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top