L.NARASIMHA REDDY
V. Dharma Reddy – Appellant
Versus
S. Hari Ram – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS civil revision petition is filed against the order dated 10. 7. 2001 passed by the Court of Junior Civil Judge, wanaparthy, Mahaboobnagar District, in LA. No. 162 of 2001 in O. S. No. 44 of 1996.
( 2 ) THE respondent filed the suit for the relief of perpetual injunction. According to him, he purchased the suit schedule property from the petitioners through a saledeed dated 13. 6. 1996. The petitioners contended that the respondent is yet to pay part of consideration, and, in that view of the matter, he was not delivered the possession of the suit schedule property. It was in this context, that the respondent intended to rely upon an agreement of sale dated 23. 4,1996 said to have been executed between them.
( 3 ) THE respondent filed LA. No. 195 of 2001 calling upon the petitioners herein to produce the agreement of sale dated 23. 4. 1996 said to have been executed between them. He pleaded that the original of the agreement of sale was taken by the petitioners at the time of execution of the sale-deed on 13. 6. 1996. The petitioners did not agree with the contention of the respondent. It was in that context that the respondent filed LA. No. 162 of 2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.