SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 674

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
S. Ravinder – Appellant
Versus
G. Dasarath – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS civil revision petition is filed against the order dated 4. 3. 2004 in i. A. No. 99 of 2004, which in turn was filed in I. A. No. 1794 of 2003 in O. S. No. 1000 of 2003 on the file of the II Additional Senior civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District.

( 2 ) THE respondent filed the suit against the petitioner, for the relief of specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 17. 7. 2003. The respondent also filed i. A. No. 1794 of 2003 under Order XXXIX rule 1 C. P. C. for a temporary injunction restraining the petitioner from alienating the suit schedule property. When the enquiry into I. A. No. 1794 of 2003 is in progress, the petitioner filed I. A. No. 99 of 2004 under rule 3 of Order XIII read with 115 C. P. C. for rejection of the agreement of sale dated 17. 7. 2003 on the ground that it is neither registered nor properly stamped. The Trial court rejected the I. A. through the order under revision, by taking the view that the admissibility or relevance of the document can be considered only at the stage of recording the evidence and it is too early to pronounce upon the validity or otherwise of the agreement of sale.

( 3 ) LEARNED Counsel for the pe






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top