ELIPE DHARMA RAO
M. Nagamma – Appellant
Versus
D. A. Nathan – Respondent
( 1 ) THE appellant herein who is the unsuccessful plaintiff has preferred the second appeal questioning the judgment and decree dated 2-12-2000 in a. S. No. 33 of 2000 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Gooty reversing the judgment and decree dated 19-6-2000 in o. S. No. 199 of 1997 on the file of the court of Junior Civil Judge, Gooty, Anantapur district.
( 2 ) FOR the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to hereinafter as they are arrayed in the suit.
( 3 ) ORIGINALLY the suit was filed seeking permanent injunction restraining the respondents, their men and agents from interfering with her peaceful possession and enjoyment over the plaint schedule property.
( 4 ) THE facts leading to the filing of this appeal can be summarised as follows:
( 5 ) PLAINTIFF is the owner of the plaint schedule property consisting of poramboke open site and she has been in possession and enjoyment of the same since about 20 years. In the year 1983, she gave a representation to the President, Gram panchayat to grant patta in her name and subsequently the President recommended to the District Collector, Anantapur for granting patta in favour of the plaintiff. Su
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.