SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 744

ELIPE DHARMA RAO
S. Rukman Naik – Appellant
Versus
P. Anjani Prabha – Respondent


ELIPE DHARMA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS Memorandum of Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for violating the directions of this Court in CMP. No. 316 of 2002 in s. A. No. 14 of 2002, dated 14-1-2002 in the interest of justice.

( 2 ) BEFORE proceeding with the contempt case, for proper appreciation of the factual matrix, respective pleadings of the parties may be relevant.

( 3 ) PETITIONER is the owner and in possession of 729 sq. yards in Plot No. 77/19 of Yamuna Nagar Co-operative Society, survey No. 102/3 of Hakimpet Village of shaikpet Revenue Mandal, Hyderabad. In 1992, when the respondents tried to interfere with his peaceful possession over the said plot, he filed O. S. No. 1485 of 1992 on the file of the Court of VII Junior Civil Judge, city Civil Court, Hyderabad. As a counterblast, the respondents also filed o. S. No. 1686 of 1992 on the file of the same Court. Hence, both suits were clubbed and tried together. After full-fledged trial, the Trial Court decreed the suit of the petitioner and dismissed the suit of the respondents. Assailing the judgment and decree in O. S. No. 1485 of 1992, the respondents filed A. S. No.





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top