D.S.R.VERMA
R. Vijayudu – Appellant
Versus
N. Ramachandra Reddy – Respondent
( 1 ) DESPITE service of notice, none appears for the respondents,
( 2 ) HOWEVER, since the legal position is settled, I deem it fit to dispose of the present civil revision petition at the admission stage itself.
( 3 ) HEARD the learned Counsel for the petitioner.
( 4 ) THIS civil revision petition is directed against the order, dated 5. 8. 2002, in I. A. No. 1272 of 2002 in O. S. No. 1307 of 1999 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, kurnool.
( 5 ) THE petitioner is the defendant and the respondent is the plaintiff. The suit is filed for permanent injunction.
( 6 ) FOR the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as arrayed in the suit.
( 7 ) THE plaintiff undisputedly filed I. A. No. 1861 of 2000 seeking appointment of a commissioner, the purpose of which is not very relevant. The Commissioner submitted his report in the month of april, 2001. Subsequently, both the parties adduced evidence, both oral and documentary. The matter was being posted for arguments since July, 2002. At that stage, the present la. No. 1272 of 2002 had been filed by the plaintiff seeking redirection to the advocate-Commissioner and surveyor appointed in I. A. No. 1861
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.