SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 727

D.S.R.VERMA
R. Vijayudu – Appellant
Versus
N. Ramachandra Reddy – Respondent


D. S. R. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) DESPITE service of notice, none appears for the respondents,

( 2 ) HOWEVER, since the legal position is settled, I deem it fit to dispose of the present civil revision petition at the admission stage itself.

( 3 ) HEARD the learned Counsel for the petitioner.

( 4 ) THIS civil revision petition is directed against the order, dated 5. 8. 2002, in I. A. No. 1272 of 2002 in O. S. No. 1307 of 1999 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, kurnool.

( 5 ) THE petitioner is the defendant and the respondent is the plaintiff. The suit is filed for permanent injunction.

( 6 ) FOR the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as arrayed in the suit.

( 7 ) THE plaintiff undisputedly filed I. A. No. 1861 of 2000 seeking appointment of a commissioner, the purpose of which is not very relevant. The Commissioner submitted his report in the month of april, 2001. Subsequently, both the parties adduced evidence, both oral and documentary. The matter was being posted for arguments since July, 2002. At that stage, the present la. No. 1272 of 2002 had been filed by the plaintiff seeking redirection to the advocate-Commissioner and surveyor appointed in I. A. No. 1861



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top