SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 956

G.BIKSHAPATHY, S.R.K.PRASAD
Saranam Peda Appaiah – Appellant
Versus
S. Narasimha Reddy – Respondent


G. BIKSHAPATHY, J.

( 1 ) THE important question that arises for consideration in the civil revision petition is with regard to the interpretation of Article 6 (B) of schedule-I-A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 as amended by A. P. Act 21 of 1995.

( 2 ) BEFORE we delve into the legal aspects of the case we shall refer to the facts of the case on hand,

( 3 ) THE revision petitioner is the defendant in the suit. Plaintiff-respondent filed a suit in O. S. No. 19 of 2000 before the learned Senior Civil Judge, Nandigama for specific performance of Agreement of sale dated 18. 2. 1997. The said agreement was drafted on a stamp paper of the value of Rs. 100. 00. Under the said agreement, an extent of Ac. 6-95 cents of agricultural land was sought to be sold to the plaintiff for a total sum of Rs. 2,43,250. 00. Out of the said amount, the defendants have received a sum of Rs. 1,25,000. 00 towards the advance and balance was agreed to be paid on or before 20. 3. 1997. Since the transaction did not come through the plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of the aforesaid agreement of Sale. The matter was being contested by the defendant. The lower court also framed the issue basing on the







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top