SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 949

V.ESWARAIAH
G. Venkateswar Rao – Appellant
Versus
Centre for DNA Finger Printing and Diagnostics (CDFD), Nacharam, Hyderabad – Respondent


V. ESWARAIAH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner filed this writ petition seeking to issue a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not acting on the basis of the acquittal by the Criminal Court when he was prompt to take action on the basis of conviction as illegal and arbitrary and to direct the first respondent to reinstate him into services with all consequential benefits. As mala fides are also attributed to the director of the first respondent the said director is made a party-in-person as second respondent.

( 2 ) THE first respondent is a Centre for dna Finger Printing and Diagnostics (CDFD), represented by its Director. The first respondent though registered under andhra Pradesh Public Societies Registration act, its Governing Council consists of the senior Government Officials headed by the chairman of Rank of Secretary, Government of India. The first respondent is funded by the Government of India and the charges collected by the first respondent from the public and investigating agencies to provide dna Finger Printing and related services are credited to the Government Treasury/ sub-Treasury/reserve Bank of India or in any of the Nationalized Banks. Therefore, it


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top