SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 936

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Setti Siddamma – Appellant
Versus
S. Ramulu – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS civil revision petition is filed by the plaintiff in O. S. No. 42 of 1999 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Narayanpet, aggrieved by the order dated 30. 7. 2004 in c. F. R. No. 557 of 2004.

( 2 ) PETITIONER filed the suit for declaration of title and perpetual injunction in respect of the suit schedule property. Respondents filed their written statement. They could not file certain documents along with the written statement. Therefore, they filed LA. No. 27 of 2004 under Order VIII rule 1 (3) C. P. C. to receive the documents. The Trial Court ordered the same and received the documents. The petitioner filed a revision before this Court challenging the same, and the revision was dismissed.

( 3 ) THE evidence on behalf of the petitioner was closed. On behalf of the respondents, an affidavit in lieu of chief-examination was filed. In that, reference was made to various documents that were received by the Trial Court through its order dated 19. 2. 2004 in LA. No. 27 of 2004. The petitioner filed a memo dated 2. 7. 2004 taking objection to the reference to various documents in the affidavit filed by D. W. I, in lieu of his chief-examination. Through its






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top