SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 933

GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, T.MEENA KUMARI
Rajoli Fakruddin – Appellant
Versus
Maryam Bee – Respondent


T. MEENA KUMARI, J.

( 1 ) THE appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 17-4-1995 in O. S. No. 5 of 1993 passed by the learned Subordinate judge, Gadwal.

( 2 ) FIRST defendant is the appellant and the second defendant is the second respondent and the plaintiff is the first respondent herein. The parties will be referred to as they were arrayed before the court below for the sake of convenience.

( 3 ) PLAINTIFF filed the suit for rendition of accounts, declaring that the plaint schedule properties are acquired out of the profits of Khaji Traders and assets of sri Khaji Abdul Khader Saheb, for partition and separate possession by metes and bounds of the Plaint "a", "b" "c" and "d" schedule properties between the plaintiff and 2nd defendant in equal shares and for mesne profits and correction of pahanies.

( 4 ) THE case of the plaintiff is that the plaintiff and the 2nd defendant are daughters of late Khaji Abdul Khader Saheb. Late khaji Abdul Khader Saheb brought up first defendant and entrusted his business affairs to him. In the year 1976 Khaji traders firm was established and since its inception he has been looking after the affairs of the firm as managing partner.














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top